Market analyst
Reads price action, trend structure, relative volume and volatility for the symbol you name, and says plainly whether the tape agrees with the story.
TradingAgents sends a team of AI analysts at any ticker. They read the filings, the tape, the news and the crowd, then debate each other until one defensible call is left.
Free to try in the console below. Plans add saved reports, watchlists and longer debates.
Type a ticker and run the desk. Nine agents read the filings, the tape and the news, argue both sides, then hand you one report.
Each agent owns one question and answers it with its own evidence. Nothing is shared until the debate, which is what stops the team from agreeing on the first plausible story it finds.
Reads price action, trend structure, relative volume and volatility for the symbol you name, and says plainly whether the tape agrees with the story.
Scans headlines, filings and transcripts for catalysts inside the holding window, and drops the items that do not move the thesis.
Measures retail chatter and sell-side positioning, so you know whether the crowd is already long before you are.
Works the last filing: margins, guidance, cash conversion and estimate revisions, with the numbers cited in the report.
Argues the long case with evidence, then has to defend it against every objection the bear raises.
Argues the short case just as hard, so a weak thesis falls apart in the debate instead of in your account.
Weighs both sides, records which argument won and why, and sets the confidence attached to the rating.
Turns the call into entry, target, stop and position size, then caps the size when volatility or event risk says so.
The whole run is written down as it happens, so you can read the reasoning instead of trusting a black box.
Type any liquid ticker. The desk pulls the tape, the filings, the transcript and the news for that name only.
Four analysts report first, in parallel, each with its own evidence trail and no shared conclusion to anchor on.
Bull and bear researchers argue the case, and the research manager records what survived.
You get a rating, a confidence level, entry, target, stop, size and the risk notes behind it.
Depth depends on what actually exists for the symbol. The report always names the feeds it used and the ones that were thin.
| Universe | Symbols | Feeds | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|
| US large cap | 1,000+ | Full filings, transcripts and options data | Deepest |
| US mid and small cap | 3,400+ | Filings and price action, thinner sentiment | Standard |
| ETFs and indices | 600+ | Flows, breadth and sector rotation | Standard |
| Crypto majors | 24/7 | Spot, funding and social velocity | Standard |
One page, five parts, no filler. If the desk could not reach a conclusion, the report says that too.
Rating, confidence and horizon sit at the top, so you can stop reading if that is all you needed.
Both arguments, with the evidence each side leaned on and the point where one of them broke.
Valuation, revisions and the levels that matter: entry, target, stop and invalidation.
Concentration, event risk and volatility, including the reasons the desk would step aside.
Every claim links back to the filing, headline or price series the agent actually read.
Entry, target and stop come out of the same volatility model the risk manager used to size the position.
Filings, transcripts and headlines are linked, so you can check what an agent read before you trust what it wrote.
Re-run a name a month later and the new report sits next to the old one, including what changed in the debate.
A single prompt finds the first story that fits the data. Structured disagreement is the cheapest way to find out whether that story survives contact with the other side.
Each agent has one job, one dataset and no sight of the others until the debate begins.
Rounds where the two sides stay close are reported as low conviction instead of being smoothed into a buy.
Reports, watchlists and notes are tied to your account and are never published to a shared feed.
The transcript of the run is kept, so a call can be reviewed after the fact instead of only when it is made.
Watchlists re-run on a schedule, so the desk tells you when a thesis actually changed.
Every rating comes with the argument that produced it, which is the part you can learn from.
Researcher, Pro and Team plans add saved reports, watchlists and longer debates. Annual billing takes about 17% off.
TradingAgents is an AI research desk. Instead of one model answering one prompt, a team of specialist agents works the same ticker from different angles, argues the case out, and hands you a single report with a rating, levels and risk notes.
No. The output is research material generated by language models from public data. It can be wrong, it can miss context, and it is not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. Size your own risk and do your own checks.
US large caps get the fullest treatment: filings, transcripts, options and sentiment. Mid and small caps, ETFs, indices and the major crypto pairs run with the feeds that exist for them, and the report says which ones were thin.
Most single-name runs finish in under a minute. Longer names with many filings can take a couple of minutes, and the console shows which agent is working the whole time.
Yes. Every run is saved to your account with its inputs, so you can come back to a call later and check what the desk said before the move happened.
Yes. Plans are monthly or annual subscriptions billed through Stripe, and you can cancel from your account at any time. Access continues to the end of the period you already paid for.
Nine agents, one report, and a record of how the call was reached.